English | 中文版 |  Русский

Breaking News:

Read our Asia Exclusive Material

Source: www.asiaecon.org |

APEC Free Trade Area Leaves Smaller Nations Skeptical


The Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum held in Hanoi from November 17 to 19 resulted in renewed discussions on trade. APEC leaders drafted a statement on the WTO’s Doha Development Agenda and the Hanoi Action Plan. The leaders agreed on the need to continue the stalled round of Doha…


The Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum held in Hanoi from November 17 to 19 resulted in renewed discussions on trade. APEC leaders drafted a statement on the WTO’s Doha Development Agenda and the Hanoi Action Plan. [1] The leaders agreed on the need to continue the stalled round of Doha trade negotiations. However, they refuse to empower negotiators to execute this goal until all members are better prepared for liberalization. [2] The longer APEC nations put off negotiating a multilateral agreement, the more difficulties they are likely to face. It will be considerably harder to catch up with developed nations and trade blocs such as the EU. APEC will also be losing potential profits. To prevent unequal economic gains, protection of smaller, vulnerable nations is necessary. However, all will lose if Asian economies continue to interact with one another as inefficiently as they currently do. If these nations are going to remain internationally competitive, they must consolidate economic power.

The slow pace of progress invites criticism. Is APEC really as inefficient as its detractors claim? APEC allows smaller nations to balance against stronger players such China and the US, while still cooperating with them for economic gain. [3] With the kinds of obstacles that the leaders face, some wariness is justified. A free trade area only has potential if developing countries in APEC take necessary precautions. They must be strong enough to withstand fluctuations in international markets before they open their economies to free trade. Capacity-building measures and the flexibility for leaders in determining national trade policies will prevent an agreement from benefiting members unequally.

APEC nations should not delay too long, or they risk lagging behind economically. A free trade agreement between APEC nations would facilitate trade within the bloc and internationally. These countries already control nearly half the world’s trade and 56 percent of global gross domestic product. [4] WTO negotiations had come to a halt because of disagreement on subsidies. [5] In Hanoi, the US and Japan did not complete unfinished discussions on reductions in agricultural subsidies. China and Australia also have yet to consider further tariff cuts on industrial goods. The conference, however, did open debate for the first time since Doha and concessions are likely to follow.

The Hanoi Action Plan outlines details of a multinational agreement. The agreement will streamline the negotiation process and replace 50 bilateral treaties. [6] It proposes that members institute measures which will prepare economies for trade liberalization. The Plan also identifies corruption as an obstacle to growth. [7] The leaders also focused on energy security. Development of renewable technologies and cleaner use of fossil fuels are among the issues of concern. [8]

The difficulties in WTO negotiations have made leaders wary. [9] The chances for success may be higher for a regional trade area. The EU for instance has proved more successful, but APEC will face different challenges. Singapore’s Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong thinks that the EU trade bloc was easier to create because of greater political similarities between nations. [10] APEC includes some of the world’s richest and poorest countries. The disparity in economic backgrounds also makes it difficult to find common ground. [11]

The conference agenda included discussions of pandemic diseases such as AIDS and disaster response plans. Vietnamese President Nguyen Minh Triet issued a statement on North Korea’s nuclear arsenal. Some are critical of the meeting’s success since no declaration was issued. [12] APEC does provide a forum for world leaders to discuss pressing concerns, but international security is not the organization’s primary focus. Those types of discussions would diffuse its main purpose which is to discuss economic development and trade.

APEC should begin negotiations much sooner than it plans. It can simultaneously help its smaller members strengthen their economies. The bloc could integrate weaker economies, seeking to strengthen vulnerable industries, at a slower pace. Other necessary measures include improving infrastructure and reforming laws. Meanwhile, nations can continue to sign bilateral or even smaller multilateral agreements. They can also provide aid to some of the lesser developing nations. APEC should also begin to develop enforcement procedures. As a trade bloc, the organization could later leverage its influence to more effectively address security and health issues.



Source: www.asiaecon.org |

 

Comments

No comments yet


Log in to leave a comment


About Exclusives

AEI publishes Exclusives, an original online publication on topics concerning international business, specifically Asia. All issues of the Exclusives are available for free. Exclusives maintains the highest level of scholarly integrity. Therefore, AEI is quite flexible in terms of the style and approach of prospective authors and does not seek to influence authors in their topic choice and encourages provocative yet substantive submissions. Exclusives are published periodically when an appropriate number of articles have been received, reviewed and approved. This has generally been about one issue per month, but varies as events of interest happen and seasonal fluctuations in submissions occur. All published articles are original works based on the research and analysis of the author. Publication of an opinion or viewpoint within Exclusives doesn't reflect endorsement by the AEI. Because an official Institute-wide position would interfere with the intellectual independence of individual scholars and journalists, AEI takes no institutional positions on policy issues or attempts to influence legislative bodies.

Exclusives FAQ

Can anyone submit an article ?

Yes. We are open to submissions from anyone. AEI Editors make their article selections based on the quality of content and insightfulness of the prospective authors, not their institutional affiliations.

Are there formatting requirements for submission ?

Yes. See the Submission Guidelines page for details.

Can I put an Exclusives article on my resume/CV ?

Yes. Although we are not a peer-reviewed academic journal we do review and edit submissions and maintain high standards for publication.

Is the Exclusives referenced by academic indexing or database services ?

No. Not at this time.

Are contributors paid for their Exclusive articles ?

No. Paying contributors is not in the academic spirit of this publication.

Can I reprint my Exclusives article in another publication at a later time ?

Yes, but you must obtain permission from AEI to have your Exclusives article reprinted in another publication. Also, permission must be obtained each time you seek to republish the article. If permission to republish is granted, AEI must be given credit.

Who owns the Copyright for a published Exclusives article ?

Asia Economic Institute owns the copyright in any article you write for the AEI Exclusives.